In: Chatterjee D (ed) The ethics of assistance: morality and the distant needy. Singer P (2004) Outsiders: our obligations to those beyond our borders. Singer P (1972) Famine, affluence, and morality. All four scenarios can be seen in Additional file 1. Together these four scenarios were thought to provide a good basis for, and be representative of, the salient issues in medical ethics. In: Pogge T (ed) Freedom from poverty as a human right: who owes what to the very poor? Oxford University Press, New York, pp 11–54 This case involves the principles of beneficence (helping the child’s interests) versus patient autonomy or the parents’ right to decide for their child.
Pogge T (2007) Severe poverty as a human rights violation. Pogge T (2004) Assisting the global poor. O'Neill O (2004) Global justice: whose obligations? In: Chatterjee D (ed) The ethics of assistance: morality and the distant needy. O'Neill O (1996) Towards justice and virtue. Murphy L (1993) The demands of beneficence. Miller D (2007) National responsibility and global justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–122 In this context, benefit includes the principle of non-maleficence, doing no harm, and the principle of. Miller R (2004b) Moral closeness and world community. Benefit is one of the three core principles of ERIC.
#Principle of beneficence trial
Miller R (2004a) Beneficence, duty, and distance. Beneficence is a concept in research ethics that states that researchers should have the welfare of the research participant as a goal of any clinical trial or other research study.
Metz T (2007) Toward an African moral theory. In order to act with beneficence in nursing, each nurse must approach each patient as a unique individual with their own life circumstances, opinions, and. In: Pogge T (ed) Freedom from poverty as a human right: who owes what to the very poor? Oxford University Press, New York, pp 275–302Ĭhatterjee D (ed) (2004) The ethics of assistance: morality and the distant needy. Oxford University Press, New YorkĬaney S (2007) Global poverty and human rights: the case for positive duties. In: Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy.
In: Pogge T (ed) Freedom from poverty as a human right: who owes what to the very poor? Oxford University Press, New York, pp 183–218īeauchamp T (2008) The principle of beneficence in applied ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–58Īshford E (2007) The duties imposed by the human right to basic necessities. The principle of beneficence supports the following moral rules or obligations: Protect and defend the rights of others. Arneson R (2004) Moral limits on the demands of beneficence.
0 kommentar(er)
